August 2024
Robert Wexelblatt
robertwexelblatt@gmail.com
robertwexelblatt@gmail.com
Bio Note: I live near Boston and teach at Boston University.
Author's Note: This latest lengthy lucubration from Mrs. Podolski seems fitting for an election year, this one in particular, perhaps. As always, she is speaking with her young friend who, on this occasion, has been upset by the unexpected views of one of her co-workers.
Author's Note: This latest lengthy lucubration from Mrs. Podolski seems fitting for an election year, this one in particular, perhaps. As always, she is speaking with her young friend who, on this occasion, has been upset by the unexpected views of one of her co-workers.
Mrs. Podolski on Democracy
My dear, it’s all right. Go ahead, talk politics. I guess you got a shock when Brenda told you how she’s going to vote and then—tell me if I’m wrong—she started to proselytize. No, no need to apologize. Politics is mostly talk, but that’s not to say the talk’s inconsequential. In fact, I think people don’t do it enough—I mean to each other, I mean informed conversations, without the slogan-cudgels and sawed-off bumper stickers. So, you mentioned democracy and Brenda scoffed? Well, democracy may not be as fragile as Brenda is cynical. You know those tires that seal themselves around six-inch nails? Democracy’s self-correcting too; you can make a change without killing anybody. The Athenians kept it going for a while. You could vote on everything so long as you weren’t female or a slave. What, my dear? Females and slaves. It’s what you mean by the word with all those syllables. What was it? Oh yes, intersectionality. Anyway, Athens’ sort of voting’s risky, short-term thinking, passing passions. Since Socrates, no philosopher’s had a good word for direct democracy, not even Rousseau. Plato hated it all, and dreamed of a city ruled by unelected geometers. One size fits all. Aristotle, born middle-aged and a biologist, knew better. Knew what? That no good society is perfect, dear, and no perfect society is good. Ah, you like that uninspiring one-liner? Good. Up next? The pre-imperial Romans. Once they’d packed Tarquin off, they ruled themselves decently for centuries with a constitution durable as one of their arches: One senate, two parties, and a brace of consuls, even tribunes for the legions, traders, and unlettered hoi polloi. Aristocratic and authoritarian? Sure, and patriarchal too—but there was no tyranny. It worked until they started conquering like addicts, amassing their empire, which led to Julius then a whole slew of Caesars. People are sure they’re free and that their forebears weren’t. To historians history always looks inevitable. Demosthenes could have told them that empires cry out for emperors. Can you picture our City Council trying to run half of Europe? Still, it’s touching how Romans kept up the republican fiction for years, as if to admit the truth would shame them, as if their stern ancestors would rise up and point. So, democracy, you said. I can hear Brenda’s dismissive little pfft. It’s thanks to her our democracy really does feel fragile. Franklin warned us on Day One. There are always Brendas to tell us we’re not perfect, or even good. Those traditions and institutions we liked to think were stable as a pyramid are wobbling, attacked, violated, called shams or worse. Courts, public education, regular elections, and a free press. I’m worried and you are too, my dear, or Brenda wouldn’t have gotten to you, made you anxious that liberty and the rule of law are dry and dead, like hollow reeds waiting to be cut down. Ironic it should be conservatives behind it, the new kind I mean, who don’t aim to conserve anything. A few years back, one of the old sort prophesied that, if his zealous colleagues couldn’t win democratically, it’s democracy they’d give up on, not their views. No, they’d hug them all the tighter to their heaving chests and withered dugs. Sound at all like Brenda? I’m thinking of my own pal, Mrs. Debeque. Sweet woman. Last week we also got to talking politics. Ruth likes the Constitution and all the amendments but said her favorite’s the nineteenth because she loves voting, the lining up, the democratic queue of accountants, secretaries, waitresses, seamstresses, porters. She doesn’t hold with voting by mail. She says it isn’t democratic enough because you don’t see and smell your fellow citizens. I asked how she chooses a candidate. “Oh, that’s easy,” said Ruth. “I just ask Charlie who he’s for then vote for somebody else.”
©2024 Robert Wexelblatt
Editor's Note: If this poem(s) moves you please consider writing to the author (email address above) to say what it is about the poem you like. Writing to the author is what builds the community at Verse Virtual. It is very important. -JL